The United States Supreme Court ruled Monday that Albert Holland, a man convicted of killing a Pompano Beach police officer, could have his death sentence reviewed even though his lawyer missed the one-year filing deadline.

In a 7-2 ruling, the court held that Holland’s court-appointed lawyer, Bradley Collins, “seriously prejudiced” his client by not responding to messages and failing to challenge his sentence on time.

In an editorial today, The New York Times explains that the case is a victory for “human empathy” over rigid rules:

In giving Mr. Holland a second chance to make his case, the Supreme Court acted in the highest legal tradition and demonstrated why society invests so much hope in the wisdom of justices — and not just their knowledge of legal principles. Writing for the court’s majority, Justice Stephen Breyer said that a hard and fast adherence to absolute legal rules could impose “the evils of archaic rigidity.”

Justices Antonin Scalia and Clarence Thomas were the two dissenters.

0 Shares:
Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You May Also Like

In foreign policy speech, Santorum leans on exceptionalism to ‘reestablish America’s greatness’

Since his announcement of an exploratory committee for a possible 2012 GOP presidential campaign, former U.S. Sen. Rick Santorum has been carving out a campaign platform that simultaneously paints President Barack Obama as a failed leader who has no faith in his nation while portraying himself as the hopeful successor whose belief in American exceptionalism will fix all the nation's economic and national security issues. “America, in a nutshell, is all about you, and you’re free,” Santorum said Thursday.