Less than a month ago, four of Florida’s top officials filed suit against the EPA over its proposed water quality rules, a strict set of standards that would govern the amount of waste in state waterways. Now, several Northwest Florida utilities are taking similar measures, filing a lawsuit in federal court in Pensacola alleging the standards aren’t based on good science and would require extensive overhaul of treatment plants.

Okaloosa County, Destin Water Users, South Walton Utility Co., the Emerald Coast Utilities Authority and Panama City are the five plaintiffs listed in the Dec. 16 lawsuit.

Several state governmental and utility agencies have cried foul over the EPA’s standards, part of which are slated to be established by August 2012. Many have argued that the criteria are too strict to be practically enforced, and would require a massive overhaul of utility plants and lead to hefty utility bills.

But environmentalists argue that current standards, which measure nutrients in loads, are inefficient, and that cost projections of the forthcoming criteria are massively overblown. In fact, an investigation into internal emails of the Florida Department of Environmental Protection revealed that many of the cost projections used to argue against the criteria were not only disputed within the department, but were written, in part,  by those on the payroll of the affected utilities.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You May Also Like
ACLU of Florida
Read More

ACLU of Florida: ‘Choose Life’ law change could help fund ‘anti-abortion propaganda’: News. Politics. Media

Plans to rewrite the law governing Florida's Choose Life license plates have led pregnancy centers currently receiving funds to worry that portions of the new law would be not only unenforceable, but unfair. Planned Parenthood says the law could open the floodgates for organizations falsely advertising themselves as crisis pregnancy centers. Now, the Florida branch of the ACLU says that a rewrite is not only unneccessary, but that it could allow for the funding of anti-abortion propaganda.