Though the mainstream media has left the story alone, reports of a new slick of oil spotted about 40 miles out in the Gulf of Mexico, near British Petroleumās Macondo well, have many concerned.
Though the theories are un-comfirmed by BP, many worry that the oil might be the result of yet anotherĀ BP spill.Ā Several samplesĀ collected by theĀ Mobile Press-RegisterĀ in late August bore the same chemical footprint of the Deepwater Horizon oil, according to chemists with Louisiana State University. ButĀ BP executives have reported finding no leaks in the seal on the Deepwater Horizon well or the relief well, after a survey by a submersible robot.
A concentrated oil burn in the Gulf of Mexico, conducted in May 2010 (Pic by Deepwater Horizon Response, via Flickr)
On April 20, 2010, BPās Deepwater Horizon drilling rig exploded ā killing 11 oil workers and injuring 17 others. The resulting spill, which took almost three months to be capped, caused severe damage to the environment and economies of coastal communities in the five Gulf Coast states.
Progress FloridaāsĀ SpillBabySpill.comĀ ā a site initially set up after last yearās disaster ā has been reporting extensively on the new oil.
Progress Florida Executive Director Mark Ferrulo says the denials by BP are āeerily reminiscent of the early stages of the first BP oil gusher disaster.ā
āThe problem is that, if BP is our only source of factual information, then weāre in trouble,ā says Ferrulo. āBecause they have a history ā not only with the Deepwater Horizon Disaster, but with other disasters ā of not being honest to the general public.ā
The oil was first spotted during an August flyover by the nonprofit groupĀ On Wings of Care. The group was conducting a survey of whale sharks ā but instead turned up the enormous oil slick. In an Aug. 26Ā press release, BP maintained that there was āno release of oil from the Macondo well.ā (OtherĀ rumorsĀ have circulated that BP has hired a fleet of 40 shrimping boats to skim oil from the area. BP has denied those rumors.)
Interestingly, the pilot who conducted the initial flyover notified both NOAA and the U.S. Coast Guard, and wasĀ told that NOAA was currently sampling the oilĀ for BP.
During On Wings of Careās most recent flyover, which occurred on Sept. 10, the oil slick was still clearly visible and was spotted in the same general area as the initial flyover. But following its own recent flyover, the Coast GuardĀ said it didnāt spot any oil.
āItās been really strange and discomforting,ā says Progress Floridaās Mark Ferrulo. āThese [On Wings of Care] pilots were literally fling over a 10-mile long mile slick, and yet the Coast Guard said they couldnāt find it. Their video goes for nine minutes ā without any repeats. And BP says it isnāt there, but there is a BP research ship in the vicinity.ā
SkyTruth, a group that analyzes NOAA and NASA satellite imagery, hasĀ published its own reportsĀ alleging that there is indeed some sort of ongoing potential leak in the area.
āThe only real conclusive, without-any-doubt thing could be some time of video imagery,ā says Ferrulo. āUntil we get that, the speculation will remain.ā
In a related story, fresh tar balls have recently begun washing up on the shores of Alabama, following rough waters brought on by Tropical Storm Lee. Though BP has not yet said whether the tar balls are the result of a recent spill (or even last yearās spill), contractors for the company areĀ removing them anyway.