A legal memo intended to advise oil spil claims administrator Kenneth Feinberg on who is entitled to compensation suggests that many Florida claims by businesses located in areas the oil never reached may not be eligible for damages under the federal Oil Pollution Act.

  • A comercial fisherman barred from fishing in oil-covered waters
  • A hotel whose guests use waters or beaches that were covered in oil (but not necessarily located right on an oiled beach)
  • An employee of that hotel who lost wages because the hotel had fewer guests
  • A barge operator on a river that was obstructed by an oil slick and the cleanup crews working to remove it (this case is not quite as clear-cut as the first three, but still likely to be found eligible, according to the memo)

Possibly eligible:

  • A real estate agent selling beachfront property in an area affected by the oil
  • A furniture store near an oiled beach that suffered lower sales due to a decline in tourist traffic
  • A seaside restaurant whose clientele consisted predominantly of comercial fishermen who lost income as a direct result of damaged natural resources

In Goldberg’s words, “it could conceivably be appropriate to interpret OPA generously to permit these claims.”

  • A beachfront hotel located 100 miles from the nearest oiled beach, but where oil was projected to reach at some point, though this never came to pass
  • A tour boat operator located 400 miles from the nearest oiled beach who suffered losses due to misinformation about where the oil went
  • An inland fireworks stand on the road to a Gulf Coast tourism hub
  • An inland tourist destination that suffered losses because many of its visitors are also drawn to Florida’s beaches
  • A Nevada hotel that hosts conventions for the gulf seafood industry, which suffered a loss of traffic due to the spill
  • A seafood restaurant owner in Arizona whose customers were spooked by reports that gulf seafood could contain oil
  • A Connecticut company that sells snorkeling equipment that suffers a decline in sales
  • A gas station targeted by a boycott
  • A caterer serving an oil company’s corporate headquarters that suffers because the company slashes expenses

Again, these points address how Goldberg believes these claims are likely to be viewed in court, not how they will be treated by Feinberg, who has pledged to be “more generous” in his assessments.

Sandi Copes, the communications director for Florida’s attorney general, Bill McCollum, said Mr. McCollum appreciated Mr. Feinberg’s willingness to consider claims without any limitation on geographic proximity.

Goldberg Memorandum of Law

0 Shares:
Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You May Also Like

Care Net affiliate teaches sex education in Manatee County despite policy change; Planned Parenthood still excluded

Last year, Manatee County addressed a significant rise in teen pregnancy in the county by opening up its sex education policy to include a curriculum that moved beyond “abstinence-only” information. County officials blamed the limited curriculum, among other factors, for the county’s sharp rise in teen pregnancy rates. However, even though the sex education programs in the county have opened up to more comprehensive information, the program is still not completely open. Planned Parenthood is still not invited to speak to students, even though changes have allowed for information that Planned Parenthood specializes in teaching. However, Care Net, a Christian non-profit organization, remains a part of the new program.