During debate before the Houseā€™s final approval of the appropriations bill, state Rep. Chuck Chestnut, D-Gainesville, introduced an amendment that would remove the $2 million crisis pregnancy centers are slated to receive.

The House budget currently includesĀ $2 million, yet again, for the stateā€™s crisis pregnancy center network.

Crisis pregnancy centers, or CPCs, are mostly religious centers whose intention is to dissuade women from having abortions. Some Florida centers have been found toĀ distribute inaccurate informationĀ about abortion to women seeking help.

These centersĀ have not lost a dime of state fundingĀ in the past six years, while other health services have suffered deepĀ cuts. Last October, the Department of HealthĀ suggestedĀ cutting someĀ stateĀ fundingĀ to the CPCs during a committee meeting before the legislative session started. However, lawmakers have maintained funding for the centers.

Chestnut introduced an amendmentĀ (.pdf)Ā on the House floor today that would have ā€œeliminate[d] funding for the Crisis Counseling Program within the Department of Health and trasfers the funding to the Family Planning Program.ā€

Chestnutā€™s amendment failed.

In response to the proposal, stateĀ Rep. Scott Plakon, R-Longwood, filed an amendmentĀ (.pdf)Ā to his amendment that:

Restores $1,000,000 in General Revenue funding for the Crisis Counseling Program and reduces $1,000,000 in General Revenue funding from Family Planning Services within the Department of Health to restore funding levels to the original House proposal. Transfers $200,000 in General Revenue funding from Family Planning Services to Grants and Aids-Contracted Services to provide grants to organizations to oppose health care mandates that violate religious freedom and conscience protection.

Currently some religious groups are claiming a recent decision by the federal government requiring insurance companies to cover contraception is an affront to religious freedom. The federal government included an exemption for religious employers.

Plakonā€™s amendment says:

From the funds in Specific Appropriation 477, $200,000 from the General Revenue Fund shall be made available as grants to be used as legal fees for organizations that oppose coercive mandates in private health plans believed to violate religious freedom and conscience protection relation to abortion inducing drugs, sterilization, and contraception. The Department of Health shall establish an application and approval process for the allocation of these funds to specific entities.

Proponents of the mandate have pointed out that the no insurer is required to cover abortion-inducing drugs. In a conference call with several members of the U.S. House, Rep. RosaĀ DeLauro, D-Conn., explained that ā€œdrugs that are intended to induce abortions are not includedā€ in the mandate. She said the mandate was written to reduce unintendedĀ pregnancies.

0 Shares:
Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You May Also Like

Rep. Adams, pushing for health care reform repeal, still receiving public health care: News. Politics. Media

While many Republicans in Congress have come under fire in recent months for railing against federal health care reform while simultaneously accepting government-subsidized health insurance, a handful have moved to more legitimately align themselves with their position by refusing to accept the benefits afforded to federal employees. One such representative is Sandy Adams, R-Oviedo, who calls for the repeal of health care reform and has turned down Congress' health insurance plan. Adams, however, still receives taxpayer-subsidized health insurance through her husband, a Florida judge.