After searching for ways to close a state budget gap, the Florida Department of Environmental Protection came up with an idea that’s raising eyebrows: close 53 state parks.

The department says that the closures could save $6.5 million, in a state where the budget shortfall is likely around $3.62 billion. But many, including members of the House and environmentalists, say the move could be a bad one.

In a post earlier today, environmental blogger Bruce Ritchie reported on reservations from House members wary to make such a drastic move:

During a meeting Wednesday of the House Agriculture & Natural Resources Appropriations Subcommittee, Rep. Michelle Rehwinkel-Vasilinda, D-Tallahassee, called the possible park closures ā€œheart-breakingā€ and said taking such action could affect Florida’s tourism. Rep. Leonard Bembry, D-Greenville, questioned whether the cost to local economies would be more than the $6.5 million in savings to the state.

Today, Audubon of Florida released a statement arguing that the state would easily lose more than $6.5 million in lost revenue.Ā And Jennifer Fitzwater, the department’s deputy secretary for policy and planning, told a legislative committee the same thing earlier this week: ā€œI think it is a fair characterization to say the impact [lost to local communities] would far exceed the savings.ā€

ā€œFlorida’s special places are vital to both our ecology and our economy,ā€ said Julie Wraithmell, director of wildlife conservation for Audubon of Florida, in the release. ā€œOur state parks and other public lands are the backbone of our tourist economy. Sixty five percent of Florida tourists report that they enjoy nature-based activities when they visit.ā€

0 Shares:
You May Also Like