GOP Senate candidate George LeMieux (left) (Pic by Aviation Structural Mechanic 3rd Class Nicole Bieneman, via Wikimedia Commons)

GOP Senate candidate George LeMieux issued a statement today opposing a publicly funded, privately managed immigration detention center to built in South Florida.

The detention center would be built on land administered by the town of Southwest Ranches and owned by the Corrections Corporation of America, but surrounded by residential areas of Pembroke Pines and unincorporated Broward County.

Residents of Pembroke Pines and the town of Southwest Ranches have voiced opposition to the detention center since Immigration and Customs Enforcement announced it had chosen the Southwest Ranches/Corrections Corporation of America proposal in June.

“The residents of Southwest Ranches and Pembroke Pines are clearly and adamantly against building a prison on the edge of their bedroom communities,” LeMieux said.

Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz, D-Pembroke Pines, represents the district where the detention facility would be built; she said late last week that the center would have the least negative impact on residents and create short-term and long-term jobs.

In an April 2011 letter, Wasserman Schultz and Sen. Bill Nelson, D-Fla., stated their support for “the application by the Town of Southwest Ranches, Florida, in response to the ‘Request for IGSA Concept Proposal: Miami’ issued by the U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement.”

LeMieux’s statement adds:

By supporting this project, Bill Nelson is blatantly ignoring the pleas of his constituents. I know that being a United States Senator means protecting your constituents, yet Bill Nelson continues to support a highly unpopular and potentially dangerous prison in a residential neighborhood. It is time Nelson starts listening to his constituents and does what is right.

LeMieux, who was picked by former Gov. Charlie Crist to replace Mel Martinez in the Senate in 2009, supports “the right of any state, as with Arizona, to guard against illegal immigration and the crime and threat of terrorism that can go with it, where the Federal government fails to do its job. Each state has the right to craft the right solution to secure its people.”

LeMieux’s campaign website adds: “In Florida, our immigration problem is different than in the southwest. Here, illegal visa overstays are the primary problem. I support strong legislation here in Florida to require all businesses to verify immigration status, and for state and local law enforcement to check immigration status during routine law enforcement encounters with the public.”

GOP-sponsored immigration bills that would create mandatory E-Verify and allow immigration enforcement by local law enforcement did not pass in the Florida Legislature during the 2011 session.

Rep. Mario Diaz-Balart, R-Miami, sent a letter this week to Immigration and Customs Enforcement stating his opposition to the location of the detention center to be built in South Florida.

0 Shares:
Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You May Also Like

According to docs, blocking Amendment 6 one of Brown, Diaz-Balart’s ‘official duties’: News. Politics. Media

Financial records for two Florida congresspeople indicate that legal expense funds associated with their offices were created in order to defray legal costs that arise in connection with official duties and position in Congress — so why is that money being used to sue to block a Florida constitutional amendment that will handicap politicians' ability to gerrymander districts?

How gerrymandering sustains political dynasties: News. Politics. Media

One nuance of gerrymandering, the deliberate drawing of political districts to favor one group, is that the political geography can be carved up to not only favor one party, but to favor one family. Florida is preparing to reexamine district boundaries following the current census. The question for voters as they ponder two ballot initiatives intended to enact greater controls over the process, is whether the status quo is good for democracy.