The Charles G. Koch Foundation has come under fire for its involvement in hiring at Florida State University, and although the school has defended itself against accusations that it accepted Koch funding in exchange for allowing the group to hire certain staff members, FSU students continue to challenge the arrangement.

Last May, the St. Petersburg Times reported that the Koch Foundation had pledged $1.5 million for positions in Florida State University’s economics department. “In return,” wrote Times reporter Kris Hundley, Koch representatives “get to screen and sign off on any hires for a new program promoting ‘political economy and free enterprise.’” In total, FSU received a pledge of $6.5 million over the course of six years from the Koch Foundation.

FSU President Eric Barron defended the school in an op-ed run by the Times, saying that claims that the school is sacrificing academic freedom for the Koch donations are “far off the mark.” Following an ad-hoc committee investigation last summer, Barron ruled that the Koch’s “Memorandum of Understanding” did not impact the integrity of the school.

The foundation has given more than $14.39 million in grants to universities like Florida State, Auburn, Clemson, West Virginia and Utah State.

The FSU Student Senate is now introducing a resolution against the Kochs’ “undue influence on academics as established by the current agreement between the Charles G. Koch Charitable Foundation and the FSU Economics department.”

In their words, “no public institution should accept funding that is conditional upon a willingness to fulfill  or conform to a private entity’s ideological goals.”

The group is demanding that a copy of the resolution be sent to the Koch Foundation. The campaign against the FSU-Koch agreement is organized in part by Progress Florida and Florida Watch Action.

You May Also Like

Ag. Commissioner took $61K in contributions from sugar/dairy before seeking to halt ban on sugary drinks in schools

Incoming Agriculture Commissioner Adam Putnam recently petitioned the State Board of Education to delay considering a ban on sugary drinks in schools, claiming the focus on soda and chocolate milk does not address the broader picture of school nutrition while insisting students will be better served once the Department of Agriculture is given authority under the president's new child nutrition bill to establish standards for all school food offerings. ThinkProgress is reporting that Putnam received upwards of $61,000 in campaign contributions from sugar and dairy interests during the 2010 election cycle, including donations from Coca Cola and individuals associated with U.S. Sugar Corporation.