Over the weekend, the transnational center-left pollster Stanley B. Greenberg published an op-ed in The New York Times explaining what Democrats can do to regain their mojo. Among the suggested measures? Pass comprehensive immigration reform:

To show that government can protect the nation’s interests, Democrats should advocate policies that would control the borders and address problems of undocumented workers.

Dealing with this is even more important in Europe, where anti-immigrant and anti-Islamic parties are surging at the expense of the mainstream left and right parties in France, Austria, Italy, the Netherlands, Sweden and Norway, site of the recent slaughter for which an extreme right-winger has claimed responsibility.

In the face of such madness, it is tempting to view the issue as illegitimate, but mainstream parties do so at great cost. Our work in Austria and Britain shows that it is possible for progressives to champion immigration policies that protect the labor market and promote and require integration, beginning with language and schooling.

In the United States, those who advocate comprehensive immigration reform are demonstrating that they consider responsibility a primary value. My surveys show that voters want comprehensive immigration reform rather than half measures. They would like to see strong enforcement at the border and in the workplace, and the expulsion of troublesome undocumented immigrants. While favoring toughness, they also want to find ways to put undocumented workers on a path to citizenship.

In theory, the same convergence of interests that beat back an Arizona-style crackdown in Florida — visible, persistent protests by progressives and immigration activists, coupled with behind-the-scenes lobbying by business and agricultural interests — could get behind a comprehensive measure at the federal level (though perhaps not exactly as Greenberg describes).

For his part, Gov. Rick Scott downplayed the idea that he saw immigration as a high priority for the upcoming legislative session today when he invited Tallahassee reporters into his office for an “open house.” The state’s finances, as well as various insurance-related issues, seemed to weigh more heavily on his mind. He said he was disappointed that an immigration measure didn’t reach his desk this year, but noted a bill could face even more political headwinds next year, with an election looming.

He also seemed to take a more nuanced stance on the issue than he has in the past, saying he was concerned about the impact a tough enforcement measure could have on businesses, and that an ultimate solution has to come from the federal government.

Still, he said he supported a solution that sounded like the federal-local cooperation of the 287(g) program: People who break the law should have their immigration status checked out by law enforcement. What exactly it means to break the law (would traffic offenses count?) is something that still needs to be worked out, he said.

0 Shares:
Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You May Also Like

Archbishop of Miami defends ‘Religious Freedom’ amendment

Set to appear on Florida's 2012 ballot: an amendment that would repeal language in the state constitution that bans using public money to fund religious organizations. Opponents of the amendment say it would break down an important wall between church and state. Proponents such as Thomas Wenski, the archbishop of the Catholic Archdiocese of Miami, claim the Legislature is ending a law that discriminates against Catholics.

Free Market Florida lauds growth management reversal

On Friday, a near-reversal of the state's 25-year-old growth management law became law. H.B. 7207 was approved by both the House and Senate at the close of the heavily critiqued legislative session. The bill aims to reduce state oversight over local land planning decisions, allowing cities and counties greater control in approving new developments. Environmental groups argued that the bill could lead to unregulated sprawl and harm Floridian's quality of life.

Moderate Republicans joined Democrats in fighting abortion-restricting legislation

On the last day of Florida's legislative session, Sen. Evelyn Lynn, R-Daytona Beach, received the ACLU of Florida's “Defender of Freedom” award for the week. The award came on the heels of an impassioned speech she gave in opposition to a bill that requires doctors to perform an ultrasound on women seeking an abortion, with an option to view or listen to the description of the ultrasound. Lynn was among a handful of moderate Republicans who broke party lines during the session to voice their opposition to provisions aimed at limiting the right's of women in the state.