Nearly every quote you get for a solar panel, it has a crystalline solar panel. Two to three years ago, monocrystalline solar panels were the most common types of solar panels utilized in America residential solar installations.
But polycrystalline solar panels seem to have been used over the last three years. In the industry, these kinds of crystalline silicon panes are just referred to as ‘Poly’ or ‘Mono’ panels.
Monocrystalline vs. Polycrystalline
It’s recommended that you don’t tire over monocrystalline vs. polycrystalline details, but go for a good brand. What’s a dependable brand? It’s the one that has invested heavily in the quality of their manufacturing process and reputation.
Monocrystalline and polycrystalline are similar in performance. The two factors determine the outcome of lifetime system performance:
- A solar panel that lacks defects
- Having a company that replaces the panels whenever performance falls under the warranted levels
The film is a different technology that performs better in minimal light conditions. That’s when there’s partial shading or in extreme heat. But this technology is less efficient and utilizes more roof space.
It’s the most developed and the oldest of the three technologies. Like the name indicates, the panels are built from a single continuous crystal layer. They appear as single flat colors; thus, you can identify them from other types.
Monocrystalline is built via the Czochralski technique where manufacturers place silicon crystal “seed” in a vat of molten silicon. The germ is gradually withdrawn, making the molten silicon to form ingot. It’s a hard crystal substance “enveloping the seed.”
The final result is called a silicon wafer and is the one made into a cell. The Czochralski process leads to big cylindrical ingots whereby four sides are cut from ingots to build silicon wafers. A large amount of the original silicon becomes waste.
Polycrystalline or Multicrystalline is the newer technology and differs in the production process.
The process of building polycrystalline starts the same as monocrystalline. But the crystal seed is not withdrawn and is allowed to cool. It’s what forms the grains and edges in the solar cell.
Despite polycrystalline being thought as inferior to Monocrystalline, the former is known to be slightly efficient. But since they’re easy and cheap to produce, they have dominated the residential solar panels market.
Trina Solar declared it had manufactured a multi-crystalline cell with 21.25% efficiency in November 2015. That should permit them to manufacture polycrystalline modules with effectiveness ranging from 18 to 20%. The concept was thought as nearly impossible in 2013.
The new record for p-type multicrystalline solar cells saw the continued quality enhancements of multicrystalline wafers. That has aided in pushing standard 60-cell multicrystalline panes from 240W to 260W over the last couple of years.
In terms of efficiency, polycrystalline is close to monocrystalline cells.