Last Summer, after the Florida legislature shot down a proposed constitutional amendment that would have banned oil drilling in state waters, then-Gov. Charlie Crist pledged to “give ‘em hell for it.”

Crist was back in Tallahasse today to fulfill that promise, though he said he was more concerned with giving the people a chance to vote on the measure. He joined former Chief Finacial Officer Alex Sink to rally support for a constitutional amendment that would ban oil drilling in state waters.

Drilling close to Florida’s shore would create “a risk we cannot afford,” Sink said, a point driven home for her by conversations with people who were forced to close businesses after the spill.

Supporters of the amendment are pursuing two tracks: State Rep. Rick Kriseman, D-St. Petersburg, has introduced legislation proposing the amendment, and Crist, Sink, Democratic lawmakers and former Republican Sen. Durrell Peaden are backing a petition drive to get it on the ballot.

I asked Crist whether he, as a one-time supporter of offshore drilling, could explain why state politicians would oppose a ban, considering that there simply isn’t enough oil in state waters to have a meaningful impact on energy supplies.

His answer was terse: ”I guess they didn’t see the oil spill,” he said.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You May Also Like

Water Coalition places ‘slime’ billboards along I-75

The Florida Water Coalition, a group that recently filed a petition against the state's recently drafted water rules, has put up two billboards in an effort to educate Floridians and visitors about the state’s widespread algae pollution problem and to urge citizens to let their government representatives know that they don’t want more delays – they want clear limits on the amount of sewage, manure and fertilizer pollution  in our public waters.

Free Market Florida lauds growth management reversal

On Friday, a near-reversal of the state's 25-year-old growth management law became law. H.B. 7207 was approved by both the House and Senate at the close of the heavily critiqued legislative session. The bill aims to reduce state oversight over local land planning decisions, allowing cities and counties greater control in approving new developments. Environmental groups argued that the bill could lead to unregulated sprawl and harm Floridian's quality of life.