A slew of national organizations and businesses are continuing to urge EPA Administrator Lisa Jackson to approve a set of Florida-specific water pollution standards drafted by the state, rather than a set of rules promulgated by the federal government. In a letter sent to Jackson earlier this month, groups including The Fertilizer Institute argue that the state Department of Environmental Protection has “worked tirelessly” to develop its own water quality standards.

Currently, Florida relies on a narrative water quality standard, the wording of which (.pdf) has been criticized as too vague to be effective. A numeric standard, however, would express specific allowable concentrations of nitrogen and phosphorus (nutrients that often lead to algal blooms and fish kills) in water.

A lawsuit settled in 2009 resulted in a mandate requiring Florida to implement stricter rules. Though the EPA is the federal agency mandating those rules, the agency has said it would allow the Florida Department of Environmental Protection to develop its own rules, and implement them if they are approved.

A portion of those rules was slated to go into effect earlier this month but was recently delayed until July.

A piece of legislation directing the EPA to implement the Florida-drafted standards (in place of the rules drafted by the EPA) was unanimously approved by the Florida Environmental Regulation Commission, the Florida Legislature and signed by Governor Rick Scott.

“Florida is recognized as a national leader in implementing a sophisticated suite of water quality and technology-based nutrient management programs to protect its water bodies,” reads a letter from 48 business groups. “In fact, FDEP has spent more than $20 million during the last decade to collect and analyze data related to the concentrations and impacts of nutrients in Florida’s water bodies. By utilizing this data and analysis, FDEP has worked tirelessly over the past year to develop scientifically defensible water quality standards. While there will be significant costs associated with these standards, we believe they are technically achievable standards that our members and other stakeholders will be able to meet while working in partnership with the state.”

Earlier this month, a third-party review found that the EPA had underestimated the costs associated with implementing its criteria. In a statement released shortly after that review, The Fertilizer Institute President Ford B. West said that his organization was “not surprised” by the findings.

“The potential cost to the agricultural sector has been a primary concern for TFI while addressing this issue,” said West. “The National Research Council’s report validates the agricultural community’s position regarding the enormous cost associated with the implementation of EPA’s rule.”

0 Shares:
You May Also Like

Florida group at the center of Lowe’s, All-American Muslim controversy

Home improvement chain Lowe's has found itself on the receiving end of a hefty amount of backlash, following its decision to pull ads from TLC's All-American Muslim, a reality show centering on the lives of Muslims living in a Detroit suburb. Though reps for Lowe's have said that the company pulled the ads due to strong political and societal views from many individuals, a conservative, Florida-based group is at the center of the backlash.

Right-wing campaign to battle Sharia cites Tampa judge’s ruling

In an effort to support state Sen. Alan Hays' and Rep. Larry Metz's Application of Foreign Law bill, conservative commentators have recently been claiming that a Florida judge has subjected one of the parties involved in a civil law suit against the Islamic Education Center of Tampa to Sharia, Islamic law. But legal experts say the judge's ruling is hardly uncommon, and that laws of all faiths and nationalities are regularly discussed in American courts.