A measure discussed today in Congress would exempt efforts to secure the border from environmental and other regulations.

H.R. 1505, the National Security and Federal Lands Protection Act, would exempt the Department of Homeland Security from 36 federal regulations, many of them environmental laws, within 100 miles of the coast. That range would cover all of Florida, as well as Hawaii, Delaware and most of New England.

The measure was on this morning’s schedule for the House Subcommittee on National Parks, Forests and Public Lands. It is intended to “prohibit the Secretaries of the Interior and Agriculture from taking action on public lands which impede border security on such lands.” Regulations exempted include the Endangered Species Act, the Federal Water Pollution Control Act and the National Historic Preservation Act.

It also includes this provision:

The Secretary of Homeland Security shall have immediate access to any public land managed by the Federal Government (including land managed by the Secretary of the Interior or the Secretary of Agriculture) for purposes of conducting activities that assist in securing the border (including access to maintain and construct roads, construct a fence, use vehicles to patrol, and set up monitoring equipment).

The Pew Environment Group expressed its opposition to the measure in a release sent out yesterday: “While we strongly support making America’s borders more secure, this sweeping waiver of the nation’s bedrock environmental and land management laws has little to do with accomplishing that goal.”

0 Shares:
Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You May Also Like

Florida group at the center of Lowe’s, All-American Muslim controversy

Home improvement chain Lowe's has found itself on the receiving end of a hefty amount of backlash, following its decision to pull ads from TLC's All-American Muslim, a reality show centering on the lives of Muslims living in a Detroit suburb. Though reps for Lowe's have said that the company pulled the ads due to strong political and societal views from many individuals, a conservative, Florida-based group is at the center of the backlash.

Plakon: Scott’s budget renews funding for crisis pregnancy network

Since Gov. Rick Scott unveiled his 2011-2012 budget proposal last month, questions have swirled about what his recommendations might mean for particular state programs. According to state Rep. Scott Plakon, R-Longwood, one controversial program — which provides taxpayer dollars to crisis pregnancy centers that have been found to disseminate disputed information about abortion — lives on in Scott's budget.