Efforts to root out financial conflicts of interest for state lawmakers, including employment in public higher education, did not survive the Senate Rules Commitee Tuesday.

The bill being debated, S.B. 1560, would have prohibited legislators and lawmakers from working in state universities and colleges within two years after leaving public office, and it would have required those seeking reelection to surrender their public higher education jobs. It would also have directed legislators to use blind trusts and a screening process for financial disclosure filings.

The sponsor of the bill— state Sen. John Thrasher, R-Jacksonville — expressed concern that he did not have enough votes, with vocal opposition from senators who said the conflict of interest posed by voting on one’s own profession could apply to a range of other professions beyond teaching.

Sen. Gary Siplin, D-Orlando, accused the media of influencing the bill and fostering a perception of corruption among legislators. ”It’s not right to prevent somebody from making a living,” Siplin said.

State Sen. Stephen Wise, R-Jacksonville, said the bill was not broad enough to account for issues posed by lawmakers earning two state incomes simultaneously, or “double dipping.”

“‘Are you on the payroll of the Legislature or are you on the payroll of the school district?’ That’s the question,” Wise said.

The bill barely passed the Senate Rules Subcommittee on Ethics and Elections with a 7-6 vote in January.

In a Feb. 8 editorial, The Tampa Bay Times said the bill would be ineffective and a smokescreen for more important ethics problems.

You May Also Like

Feinberg a no-show at Florida Senate committee

Oil spill claims administrator Kenneth Feinberg was on the agenda to appear today before the Senate Agriculture Committee. Committee chairman Sen. Gary Siplin, D-Orlando, had pledged before the start of this legislative session to bring Feinberg, and possibly BP representatives, to answer questions about the claims process. Instead, what the committee got was a letter from Feinberg explaining that he couldn't make it, and that he would like to return some time in May to take questions from Florida lawmakers.