The Florida Supreme Court ruled today to prevent three ballot measures that were proposed by the Florida legislature from appearing on the state’s November ballot, among them the controversial Fair Districts “poison pill” that would have blunted the anti-gerrymandering effect of Amendments 5 and 6, and the so-called “Health Care Freedom” amendment, which would have prevented the implementation of the federal government’s health care reform in Florida.

The court also ruled that Amendments 5 and 6 — which, if passed, will create new rules for how legislative districts are drawn —will stand. The two amendments had been challenged by Reps. Corrine Brown, D-Jacksonville, and Mario Diaz-Balart, R-Miami.

Read or download the decisions in full after the jump:

Amendments 5 and 6 Decision Amendment 7 Decision Amendment 9 Decision
Amendment 3 Decision

You May Also Like

Does the Scott administration want to privatize camping in state parks? (Corrected)

In recent months, the Scott administration has cut $305 million from environmental land-buying projects in the state budget, all but ignored pleas to halt the construction of a Georgia-Pacific pipeline to funnel additional effluent into the St. Johns River and attempted to halt or delay the implementation of a set of criteria to govern water pollution in the state.The administration also made cuts to the state's five water management districts, and sent out a memo asking them to reexamine how they do business. Now, new allegations that the administration hopes to begin privatizing camping in some state parks have surfaced.