The Florida Supreme Court ruled today to prevent three ballot measures that were proposed by the Florida legislature from appearing on the state’s November ballot, among them the controversial Fair Districts “poison pill” that would have blunted the anti-gerrymandering effect of Amendments 5 and 6, and the so-called “Health Care Freedom” amendment, which would have prevented the implementation of the federal government’s health care reform in Florida.

The court also ruled that Amendments 5 and 6 — which, if passed, will create new rules for how legislative districts are drawn —will stand. The two amendments had been challenged by Reps. Corrine Brown, D-Jacksonville, and Mario Diaz-Balart, R-Miami.

Read or download the decisions in full after the jump:

Amendments 5 and 6 Decision Amendment 7 Decision Amendment 9 Decision
Amendment 3 Decision

You May Also Like

Judicial-bypass bill sponsor and wife of circuit court judge says law lightens ‘burdens on the courts’

State. Rep. Kelli Stargel, R-Lakeland, spoke to The Lakeland Ledger this past week about a bill she sponsored this session that changed some of the current laws for minors seeking a judicial bypass for the parental notice of abortion mandated by state law. While Stargel claims the bill provides some needed fixes, the American Civil Liberties Union of Florida has warned that the bill endangers the health of young women by infringing on privacy rights and lengthening the ruling time for a bypass. Just as interesting, though, is Stargel's own back-story with this legislation.