The proposed reductions to the AIDS Drug Assistance Program are a bad idea, and make no fiscal sense, says Jesse Fry, co-chair of the Florida HIV/AIDS Advocacy Network.
Fry, who testified in Tallahassee this Monday at the first of a series of public forums hosted by the state’s Bureau of HIV/AIDS to discuss eligibility reductions, tells The Florida Independent that proposed changes to the drug assistance program eligibility have negative workforce implications.
“If you cut the eligibility from [the current] 400 percent of the federal poverty level to 200 percent of the federal poverty level, that takes out a large income range where people can work and advance in their careers, accept promotions and eventually leave the ADAP system,” Fry says.
Fry says that with these eligibility cuts if you work at the same place for three years and are offered a promotion that pays about $35,000 you would have to turn it down because you would have to leave the AIDS Drug Assistance Program and would not be able to afford HIV medications. He estimates that there are about 1,500 to 1,600 Florida Drug Assistance Program clients that would be in this situation if the eligibility reductions are approved.
According to Fry, virtually everyone who spoke at the Monday forum — attended by Tom Liberti, chief of the Bureau of HIV/AIDS, and staff members Suzanne Stevens and Joe May — opposed these proposed changes based on humanitarian and fiscal reasons.
These public forums — more will be held in Miami and Tampa in the coming week — are the first phase of the bureau’s administrative process to change eligibility rules.
“I just advocate what is in the best interest of the state and the patient,” Fry says about the process. “I advocate what a horrible idea it would be to change the eligibility. I gave them every reason that I could. It doesn’t make any sense to reduce the capacity of the very two programs of among everything in Ryan White [program] that would allow people to grow in their jobs, advance in their careers, and get out of the system.”
Kenneth Feinberg today takes over the gargantuan task of distributing the $20 billion BP is setting aside to reimburse victims of the gulf oil spill. He has said he will approve compensation claims by relying on precedents set by state and federal law. But law professors following the issue say it is unclear just how Feinberg will interpret a key legal doctrine called “proximate cause,” which will determine exactly who gets a slice of the compensation fund.